Judges presiding over challenges to President Donald Trump‘s agenda are turning to administrative law to nullify his policies ...

"In trying to reduce the Fourth Amendment test to a formula by identifying a list of 'irrelevant' factors, the court grievously erred." The post 'Indefensible on every level': Trump admin pleads for ...

By limiting the ability of a single judge to halt executive actions across the nation, the court has restored balance to the ...

Analysis of the Supreme Court decision in Trump v. CASA and its likely consequences for executive orders, nationwide ...

Constitutional rights have to be enforceable. They can’t rely on the goodwill of the government. This utter lack of ...

A federal judge in New Hampshire on Thursday issued a preliminary injunction blocking President Donald Trump’s executive ...

A Los Angeles federal judge issued a pair of temporary restraining orders today limiting the ability of U.S. immigration agents to detain people absent reasonable suspicion […] ...

"The Court has jurisdiction to enforce its preliminary injunctions to preserve the status quo, but it does not have ...

In a closely watched decision issued on June 27, 2025, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in Trump v. CASA, Inc., ...

A SCOTUS ruling on birthright citizenship could also shut down a key strategy for financial services to block unwelcome federal rules.

That’s what made June 27 an especially momentous day in the career of new University of Chicago law professor Samuel Bray, whose scholarship on the topic of universal injunctions was cited over a ...

Unfortunately, lawmakers repealed it in 1976. Bring back the three-panel court for constitutional challenges.